The Buddhist Hour Radio Broadcast Archives

Buddhist Hour
Script No. 371
Radio Broadcast live on Hillside 88.0 FM
for Sunday 6 March 2005CE
2547 Buddhist Era


‘Traits and Abilities’, continued.


We continue now with the next part in our series of transcribed Buddha Dhamma talks by John D. Hughes during a five-day Bhavana course in June 1988 at the Buddhist Discussion Centre (Upwey) Ltd.

This excerpt is taken from a teaching entitled ‘Traits and Abilities.’

The authors of today's script apologise for any errors or misunderstandings that may have occurred in the process of transcribing and editing the talks from the original audio tape recording.

If you tuned in to the Buddhist Hour last week, Sunday 27 February, you may recall the talk ended in the following way:

[It's] like saying as a function of time your traits fade off. Normally they will just stop at your death, won't they ... to a great extent. But the abilities, the oomph you put into creation of value through your ability through working to make it, to create a new ability in you, that will carry over into your next life.

We now proceed with the next part of the talk entitled, "Traits and Abilities", continued.

Dhamma Student Leanne Eames contributed to the teaching as follows:

So you've got abilities and you've got traits. Traits are your predispositions to different pursuits. Abilities are what you actively build. Usually initially they are predetermined by your traits but abilities are what you actively build in this life. Those abilities in your next life will become your traits or your predispositions. So in building your abilities you are building your traits for your next life.

In building your abilities you do so because of a kammic disposition which provides you with an energy of pursuit. So that, for example, my resolve has been to pursue Japanese studies to an extremely high level. Until I get to that point I have resolved just to persist and to pursue. Because on one level it’s a worldly pursuit it means that that pursuit is subject to a saturation point or a satisfaction point at which time the interest, the energy of that pursuit will die down, maybe re-flicker a few times and fade away over a period. This can be over a period of one life or several lives, probably two or three.

What this means in developing your ability in the Dhamma is that you develop, you must develop this ability on top of every worldly pursuit, across every band so that whatever traits come to you in your next life from former lives have got a Buddha Dhamma Refuge trait on top of them.

You still have to build, you still have to develop your ability but by putting a, developing your Buddha Dhamma Sangha Refuge across all your worldly pursuits means that you are giving yourself your best bet of ensuring you come to Buddha Dhamma Sangha Refuge again. So when one, one worldly pursuit dies and fades you put your Buddha Dhamma Sangha, your Buddha Dhamma practice pervades your next kammic worldly pursuit.

So that, so that your Buddha Dhamma Sangha Refuge is a trait and an ability and in that way you build your future practice and you expand your practice to cross every band because that's your best bet of ensuring that you have Buddha Dhamma Sangha traits in your next birth.

Knowing that whatever kammic worldly pursuits you follow are subject to reaching that saturation point and then flickering and fading off you mustn’t attach your Buddhist practice to one area. You mustn’t make it dependent on one worldly pursuit otherwise when by a natural process that pursuit reaches the point of decay your Dhamma practice will decay as well because you made it dependent on something worldly.

Because you're in the world it has to be worldly, but you put it across every possible pursuit, every area, every event in your life. You, you safeguard or you prepare or you plant the seeds and you build, you build your Dhamma practice in every area so that there's no gaps left.

John D. Hughes continued:

So you see in the words, you know you hear like, you know Buddham Saranam Gacchami, Dhammam Saranam Gacchami, Sangham Saranam Gacchami, Dutiyampi, that's your hearing consciousness catered for but where is the equivalent on your seeing consciousness? All you do is hear, and so on. See if you know anything about quick learning techniques, if you want to learn something quickly, you engage several of the sense consciousness[es]. For example, it's quicker to see something and write it and hear it. The learning rate is faster under those conditions.

So the method of, you know, of the teacher writing on the blackboard, talking as she writes or he writes and you writing down as you hear is a very efficient way of teaching. Talking and chalking is a very highly efficient way of teaching, whereas putting things on a overhead projector without, and just looking at them and just seeing only. So you know one of the good things is to become an incessant note taker and things like that.

The more senses you engage, the more sense bases ... sense consciousnesses you engage when you're learning something, the better. So for example bowing, which means you move your body, involves you touching and so on. And the physical offering of flowers to Buddha, Dhamma, Sangha or offering of light engages many senses and so on. So there is, if you understand how learning takes place, it takes place obviously through the sense bases plus the mind.

So gearing the sense bases, see it was easy in Buddha's day because you could see a living Buddha, you could see all these Arahants, it was a very intense place to be when the Buddha was alive. And you know many, many Suttas say, you know, so and so saw the Buddha and was so amazed just immediately bowed down and paid respect. When you get near the Buddha.

The Buddha left the Bodhi tree, see what happened was the Buddha traveled a lot, he walked around a lot to different places. But he had sort of one main temple and then people used to come for hundreds of miles to visit him and they'd say, "Oh, the Buddha's gone for a walkabout. You know he'll be back in a couple of weeks". Now he had no Buddha images of course, he had no photographs or any memorabilia in the Buddha's day. So the monks came to the Buddha and said, "What, what can we do if someone comes and they want to pay respect to you and you're not at the temple? What can we do?" And there was a lot of discussion. You can read it in the Suttas.

But the outcome was they went to where the Buddha became enlightened and they took a cutting of the Bodhi tree under which the Buddha became enlightened. The Buddha planted it in front of the temple and it just went whoosh, it just shot into the air, grew very quickly. That’s the power of the Buddha. And then the Buddha said, "When I'm not here you can pay respect to the Bodhi tree as the symbol of the Buddha".

Because the Buddha became enlightened under the Bodhi tree, that's the history of why Bodhi trees are placed in temples. You can read a lot of things about the Bodhi tree. So one of the things of respect is to, to the Bodhi tree which I’ve done in Sri Lanka and Hong Kong and Bangladesh and I've seen many, many Bodhi trees in many countries and in Australia I've paid respect to the Bodhi trees here.

So they're devices for establishing sound refuge in Buddha Dhamma Sangha.

They're learning experiences that have a significance on the mind. They're much more powerful. When I paid respect to the Bodhi tree in Sri Lanka which was brought over by Sanghamitta, oh, about 1600 years ago, a very beautiful, it's got solid gold bars around the top of it, like national treasure. And the minute I bowed I knew the Buddha was there. I knew the Buddha's Mind. I'm used to the Buddha's Mind, I know the Buddha's mind, I can feel. And Buddha was there. Buddha Mind was definitely in the Bodhi tree in Sri Lanka.

So I was just so knocked out, to use your jargon, I thought, “Ah, marvellous”. There was just a monk standing there. I just paid respect to the monk three times because I thought, "That's Buddha". And the first monk I saw, I don't know who he was, he might have been a novice, or he might have been a chief monk, I don't know, it doesn't really matter, so I established powerful refuge as a absolute knowledge on my mind and of course where the Buddha is, there's Dhamma.

Now that is a very powerful, that's my good kamma you see, that I could get to the Bodhi tree and pay respect and also be under the perfect conditions. Now of course we've got Bodhi leaves here, I don't know there's some in there, I've got Bodhi leaves here from about 14 different countries and I suppose I've got them from cuttings from the Bodhi trees from about, oh maybe 30, 35 different Bodhi trees. So the Bodhi tree is very close here, the Bodhi leaves they're above the Buddha’s head on those images, you see a mark on them. So I can pay respect to the Bodhi tree.

Now of course the British, in their indubitable way, said, “Buddhists worship trees.” Now of course that's not true. We don't worship trees at all. Maybe Melba does worship tree Devas. So there are devices of getting powerful. As your Refuge grows stronger your mind automatically knows, like a wisdom insight knowledge of how to intensify. And of course that’s why, you know I don't have to wake up in the morning and think "Now who am I, oh what am I doing here?" "Oh I'm Buddhist, now what do I do now? What's a Buddhist do?" I don't have to think like that, I just know.

Here the students were instructed to take rest before John D. Hughes proceeded with teaching as follows.

So because of past lives, you've been, you've practiced every religion. There's 54 religions, there's a Sutta that the Buddha analyses. A few years ago we did an analysis of that Sutta to show you what's the positive things of religions and what's the misconceptions and what the base is. But you see because of that you ritualise everything. You ritualise boiling an egg. You ritual, like the phantom spoon taper ritualises making a cup of coffee.

One of the characteristics of human beings is they ritualise things. So they never do anything fresh. And one of the things, if you've ever been to a mental hospital, I went out, there's a woman I know I went to visit her. And you see these old senile ladies out there and they're doing these elaborate things and I watched and I thought, "What are they doing?", and they were folding nappies, you know they were pining to be ... looking, they were going through a set of hand motions, and I watched and I realised what they were doing was folding nappies.

And another woman was going through imaginary ironing motions because you see the symbolism of ironing say your husband’s shirts or whatever is a sort of love substitute and its symbolic of the fact that you married because presumably other people don't wash your husband’s shirts. So this woman was a bit whacko and she was trying to recapture love. Perhaps her husband had died or something. Maybe that's the shock of what put her in the place. So she was going back to a ritual that would give her some contact with whoever she loved.

So you see, you see these phenomena. Now it’s natural to ritualise things. As you realise, the pop culture depends on a lot of body language. The pop stars have got unified body language and the fans recognise the coding so certain body languages you whoop or you applaud or you stamp your feet. Others you're quiet. So the whole thing is orchestrated like the 1936 Berlin games that the Nazis organised.

It was one of the, they had a great man who was an expert in propaganda. So for example they, they had psychologists as I was telling you in the German army, they said [to] the very bright nimble intelligent people, we'll make staff officers, you know the higher officers. The lazy officers we'll put in ordinary base wallah jobs where they can be relied upon to do dull repetitious work. Like in an army there's some work where the work's just repetitive.

But they said if someone is both bright and lazy kick him out of the army because he's dangerous. So the combination of being very bright and very lazy is a dangerous combination as a trait. Do you follow what I mean? Because normally if you've met a lot of criminals as I have, criminals are often very bright and very lazy. So they look for the fastest way of getting some money, or whatever they want, they're ingenious and they're lazy. So instead of working systematically which means a lot of sustained effort, a lot of persistence, being persistent, they devise the quick quid. The criminal track.

So you can predict, you can actually predict fairly well because of the masses of data that’s been amassed. Personal predictions are, you can fairly, fairly well predict the outcome of someone. If you see a potential criminal kid, I used to see a lot of potential criminals, some of them actually ended up in jail as I predicted.

But some I'd spend hundreds of hours on [them] to give them an ability to override their natural combinations which would turn them to criminality. So like every society has criminals and a combination of bad traits predisposes, or almost automatically is the career path to criminality. Now criminality, Buddhism is the opposite of criminality, if you can see it that way.

Whatever traits you've got to make you into a criminal, you have to write on abilities more powerful to override those traits. The main abilities you write on is precepts. It’s not natural, you know if we talk on averages, it’s not normal for human beings to keep five precepts because their culture in every country in the world isn't a culture of five precepts. In some Buddhist countries to some extent in patches, you might find a whole village.

There is one Buddhist Sutra where he went and he spoke to the people in the village, 50,000 people, they all attained Sottapan during the Buddha’s talk. And then later on there's another Sutra where one of the monks said, "Why did that happen?" and the Buddha, the Buddha explained the kammic causes going back many generations of why that particular village.

Many generations back there was a great organiser who generated a lot of wealth for the village. The wealth was available to everybody. Everybody worked diligently. Their culture was to get rid of laziness. In other words, they didn't let people laze around. That was perpetuated for a few generations and then people with their good kamma who were not indolent, not lazy, were born in that village. And it was a very prosperous village.

So it didn't have any beggars. Remember beggars have been around for ages. It didn't have any criminals. It was a most exceptional village. The children were respectful of elders. That was part of the culture that had been built into the village. There was no killing over land. There was some sort of an elder agreed on arbitration system for settling disputes. And disputes were settled in a manner that didn't breed hate, and so on. And if you read the Buddhist Sutras someday you'll see.

Because of this it happened that the 50,000 people in the village, the whole village was predisposed by traits and built-in abilities to have a respect for superiors and of course the Buddha was a superior. Therefore they were easy to teach, therefore under the power of the Buddha's Mind they became Sottapan.

So you see there are places, which hardly exist anymore, where a whole community of 50,000 people were basically keeping five precepts and leading orderly lives. Now in this Dhamma ending age, I think I'm right in saying, that probably there doesn't exist such a place in the whole world any more where a village of 50,000 people have no criminals. Perhaps four precepts, but not five. So, so those events depend on conditions.

In other words, the Buddha's ability to teach people depended on the attention of the people to developing their good traits, abandoning their bad traits and increasing good abilities. Well, the same applies to you.

May you always have respect for superiors.

May you be teachable.

May you develop your good traits, abandon your bad traits and increase your good abilities.

May you be well and happy.


This script was transcribed, prepared and edited by Julian Bamford, Frank Carter, Leanne Eames, Celestina Giuliano, Evelin Halls, Anita Hughes, Alec Sloman, Lainie Smallwood, Julie O'Donnell and Amber Svensson.

References:

Recording Title: Traits and Abilities (con't)
Tape 8, Side 2
Teacher: John D. Hughes
Date of recording: 28 June 1988
Transcribed by: Frank Carter
Checked by : Frank Carter
CD Reference 28_06_88T8S2A
File Name: 28_06_88T8S2A_JDHtranscribe.rtf


Words: 3,350

Disclaimer

As we, the Chan Academy Australia, Chan Academy being a registered business name of the Buddhist Discussion Centre (Upwey) Ltd., do not control the actions of our service providers from time to time, make no warranty as to the continuous operation of our website(s). Also, we make no assertion as to the veracity of any of the information included in any of the links with our websites, or another source accessed through our website(s).

Accordingly, we accept no liability to any user or subsequent third party, either expressed or implied, whether or not caused by error or omission on either our part, or a member, employee or other person associated with the Chan Academy Australia (Buddhist Discussion Centre (Upwey) Ltd.)

This Radio Script is for Free Distribution. It contains Buddha Dhamma material and is provided for the purpose of research and study.

Permission is given to make printouts of this publication for FREE DISTRIBUTION ONLY. Please keep it in a clean place.

"The gift of Dhamma excels all other gifts".

For more information, contact the Centre or better still, come and visit us.


© 2002. Copyright. The Buddhist Discussion Centre (Upwey) Ltd.

Back to Top